http://revenuewatch.org/EITIreports
2009
| 2008 ![]()
Report Quality Analysis
Report Compiled by W. Jacobs - Audit CJSC
EITI report Download PDF
Company Payments
Government Receipts
GDP, 2010 BILLION $ source
Total Government Revenue (% of GDP)
Reported EI Revenue
(% of Total Revenue)
| Commodity | EITI Production Volumes | Units | Indep. Source Production Volumes | Units | Price from EITI Report | Per Unit | Indep. Reference Price | Per Unit | Total Company Payments | Total Gov't Receipts | Notes |
| Precious Metals | |||||||||||
| Basic inorganic chemical substances | |||||||||||
| Antimony | |||||||||||
| Mercury | |||||||||||
| Nuclear Materials | |||||||||||
| Non-ferrous metals | |||||||||||
| Charcoal | |||||||||||
| Coal | mts | 546,131 | mts 1 | $/mt | 133.23 | $/mt 2 | |||||
| Oil | bbls | 358,314 | bbls 1 | $/bbl | 97.22 | $/bbl 2 | |||||
| Associated Gas | m3 | 28,316,820 | m3 1 | $/m3 | 0.33 | $/m3 2 |
Report Quality Indicators | ||
1. Regularity | ||
| a) score | 0.33 | |
| b) total reports / implementing years | 2/6 | |
2. Timeliness | ||
| Lag between fiscal year of data and publication year. | 1 | |
3. Materiality | ||
| Report clearly defines a materiality threshold. | No | |
4. Data Reliability | ||
| Report contains audited data from: | ||
| a) companies | No | Completed EITI templates submitted to EITI Secretariat, not the reconciller. |
| b) government | No | Data obtained from Statistics Agency. EITI template not filled out by govt. agencies. |
5. Coverage | ||
| Revenue data includes the following revenue streams: | ||
| a) royalties | Yes | |
| b) taxes | Yes | |
| c) surface, rental or license fees | Yes | |
| d) bonuses | No | |
| e) state-owned enterprise (SOE) payments | N/A | |
| f) Report covers all extractive sector companies. | No | 26/27 companies reported. |
| g) Report states the price of any product received or sold by government. | No | |
| h) Report states the quantity of resources produced. | No | |
6. Discrepancies | ||
| Report contains: | ||
| a) information on the cause of revenue discrepancies. | Yes | Not very detailed. |
| b) reconciled data following the correction of discrepancies. | Yes | |
7. SOE Revenue Flow | ||
| SOE Revenue Flow data is clearly explained in the report. | N/A | |
8. Disaggregation | ||
| Report provides financial data on individual: | ||
| a) companies | No | |
| b) revenue streams | Yes | |
| c) projects | No | |
| d) commodities | No | |
9. Comprehensibility | ||
| Report contains: | ||
| a) a summary with key findings and revenue totals | No | |
| b) clear indication of what currencies and units of measurement are used | No | |
| c) written explanation of key findings and recommendations | Yes | |
| d) a clear definition of terms | No | |
10. Accessibility | ||
| Report is available: | ||
| a) in at least one official language | Yes | Report available in Kyrgz and Russian. |
| b) on a government website | No | |
Related Indicators | ||
| Revenue Watch Index, | N/A | |
| Corruption Perception Index, 2010 | 164/178 | |
| Open Budget Survey, | N/A | |
Download and save the current view as a CSV/Excel file, or print this view using the print button above. (To save page with full layout, please select print and choose any available option to print as a PDF file.)