RWI Home
http://revenuewatch.org/EITIreports
Kyrgyzstan
Summary
- Enormous effort has clearly been made to improve the quality of the 2008 report from the first report covering 2004.
- Payments to the social fund are reconciled, which is useful, although no detail on the use of these funds is provided. It is also important to note that this fund is not extractive industry specific.
- In an effort to improve data reliability, the completed EITI templates were sent directly to the EITI secretariat and government data was provided by the statistics agency rather than by the individual government agencies.
- The report does not provide a materiality clause.
- Because the one petroleum company selected by the EITI committee did not report, the report covers only the mining sector.
- Errors and inconsistencies in currency and unit of measure create confusion. The report also adds confusion by including non-EI revenue flow data.
Data Year
2008
Publication Year
2009
EITI Status
Compliant
Compliant
Report Compiled by W. Jacobs - Audit CJSC
EITI report Download PDF
Government Receipts
$72,835,411.54
Company Payments
$74,774,186.49
GDP, 2010
BILLION US$
source
5.13
Total Government Revenue (% of GDP)
29.91
Reported EI Revenue (% of Total Revenue)
4.75
Report Quality Indicators | ||
1. Regularity | ||
| a) score | 0.33 | |
| b) total reports / implementing years | 2/6 | |
2. Timeliness | ||
| Lag between fiscal year of data and publication year. | 1 | |
3. Materiality | ||
| Report clearly defines a materiality threshold. | No | |
4. Data Reliability | ||
| Report contains audited data from: | ||
| a) companies | No | Completed EITI templates submitted to EITI Secretariat, not the reconciller. |
| b) government | No | Data obtained from Statistics Agency. EITI template not filled out by govt. agencies. |
5. Coverage | ||
| Revenue data includes the following revenue streams: | ||
| a) royalties | Yes | |
| b) taxes | Yes | |
| c) surface, rental or license fees | Yes | |
| d) bonuses | No | |
| e) state-owned enterprise (SOE) payments | N/A | |
| f) Report covers all extractive sector companies. | No | 26/27 companies reported. |
| g) Report states the price of any product received or sold by government. | No | |
| h) Report states the quantity of resources produced. | No | |
6. Discrepancies | ||
| Report contains: | ||
| a) information on the cause of revenue discrepancies. | Yes | Not very detailed. |
| b) reconciled data following the correction of discrepancies. | Yes | |
7. SOE Revenue Flow | ||
| SOE Revenue Flow data is clearly explained in the report. | N/A | |
8. Disaggregation | ||
| Report provides financial data on individual: | ||
| a) companies | No | |
| b) revenue streams | Yes | |
| c) projects | No | |
| d) commodities | No | |
9. Comprehensibility | ||
| Report contains: | ||
| a) a summary with key findings and revenue totals | No | |
| b) clear indication of what currencies and units of measurement are used | No | |
| c) written explanation of key findings and recommendations | Yes | |
| d) a clear definition of terms | No | |
10. Accessibility | ||
| Report is available: | ||
| a) in at least one official language | Yes | Report available in Kyrgz and Russian. |
| b) on a government website | No | |
Related Indicators | ||
| Revenue Watch Index, | N/A | |
| Corruption Perception Index, 2010 | 164/178 | |
| Open Budget Survey, | N/A | |
Download this data as a CSV file or print using the print button above. To save page with page layout, please select print and choose any available option to print as a PDF file.